|
EVENTS Fantasy Central Inside Game Multimedia Central Statitudes Your Turn Message Boards Email Newsletters Golf Guide Cities Work in Sports
CNNSI.com GROUP
COMMERCE |
Moment Of Truth The wildest comeback in Ryder Cup history culminated in one unlikely putt that clinched a stunning victory for the U.S. teamBy Mark Mravic
So, in its moment of truth, did replay do the job it was meant to? Judging by the Cup finals' unpleasant aftertaste, no. What's more, the NHL's experience with video review on its grandest stage doesn't bode well for instant replay when it returns to the NFL this fall. Football fans should expect no more satisfaction with officiating than they got last year, when repeated bumbling by the refs renewed the outcry for replay. More often than not, video adds to controversy rather than resolve it. (Just ask Zapruder.) Why? Because human beings still must interpret the events on the tape. Replay doesn't make the call; it merely shifts the onus from fallible officials on the field to fallible officials in the booth. How often do you find yourself grinding your teeth as a sportscaster declares that a replay offers incontrovertible proof of one thing while you see something different? The tape is rarely cut-and-dried. After an arguable possession call in the 49ers-Falcons playoff game last season, Fox commentator Matt Millen said on the air, "If somebody tells me that instant replay wouldn't have overturned it, I'm gonna take the ball and shove it down their throat." In the studio at halftime, analyst Cris Collinsworth said he thought the refs had gotten it right. We shouldn't have to resort to violence or videotape to resolve sports disputes. Games are meant to be played by people and officiated by people. Those who long for the days when sports were simpler would do well to remember that in those halcyon times, replay wasn't an issue. A blown call was a blown call. Here's hoping that Super Bowl XXXIV doesn't hinge on a call that's sent up to the booth. Issue date: July 12, 1999
|