CNN Time Free Email US Sports Baseball Pro Football College Football 1999 NBA Playoffs College Basketball Hockey Golf Plus Tennis Soccer Motorsports Womens More Inside Game Scoreboards World
EVENTS
MLB Playoffs
Rugby World Cup
Century's Best
Swimsuit '99

CENTERS
 Fantasy Central
 Inside Game
 Multimedia Central
 Statitudes
 Your Turn
 Teams
 Cities

AD PARTNERS

  Power of Caring
  presented by CIGNA


SPORTS ILLUSTRATED
 This Week's Issue
 Previous Issues
 Special Features
 Life of Reilly
 Frank Deford
 Subscriber Services
 SI for Women

FEATURES
 Trivia Blitz
 Free Email

TELEVISION
 CNN/SI - TV
 Turner Sports

SHOPPING
 CNN/SI Travel
 Golf Pro Shop
 MLB Gear Store
 NFL Gear Store

SI FOR KIDS
 Sports Parents
 Games
 Buzz World
 Shorter Reporter

SITE RESOURCES
 About Us
 myCNN
 
Inside Game

What separated the champs? Urgency

Click here for more on this story

Posted: Wednesday February 03, 1999 12:55 PM

 

Got a question or comment for Dr. Z? Click here.

Either I'm getting old and jaded, or there was an undeniable dead quality to this Super Bowl. The problem was that after the first few series I never felt that the Falcons were in the ballgame. And in the second quarter, when Rod Smith caught the 80-yarder that gave the Broncos a double-digit lead they never lost, I said that's it. Atlanta will never come back. There have been many Super Bowl blowouts, but the only other time I remember feeling that way, that early, was in the Bears-Patriots game in '86.

During the week leading up to the Super Bowl, you're always pestered by radio and TV guys looking for a quickie quote, a sound bite, anything that will indicate that you're drawing breath. And the opening line is almost invariably the same:

"Well, Dr. Z, it should be a great game."

And in idiot-lockstep, my answer is always the same:

"Either that or it won't be."

I don't bother to explain, because by then they've usually tuned out anyway, but generally, I don't care whether it's a crowd-pleaser or not. To me it's a puzzle to be solved. What happened and why? Thrills and chills? I leave that to the guys hyping the contest, although, of course, if it comes down to the wire, as the Broncos-Packers did in '98, so much the better.

 
All I ask for, really, is something that's fairly competitive, but I didn't get that from Supe XXXIII. What I got was a weird approach by the Falcons, an adherence to status quo that doomed them fairly early.

The problem was that they played the game as if they were seven-point favorites instead of seven-point 'dogs. They seemed to say, this is our thing and we'll do it. Never mind what the scoreboard shows.

I'm not talking about offense. Jamal Anderson ran hard and got his yards. Chris Chandler moved the ball at times, but the pressure of an unrelenting set of blitz packages did him in, along with passes that just missed, a big interception off a deflection, etc. But even if he had put more points on the board, I never felt that they'd be able to catch up to the Broncos.

Even with Shannon Sharpe down with a twisted knee and Ed McCaffrey a non-factor and Terrell Davis, as we found out later, cramping up from a pulled groin, Denver had 17 points and 266 yards by halftime. Then it was all downhill. John Elway sat back in the pocket and picked the zone apart. It was like stealing. The Falcons rushed four -- granted, it's one of the premier front fours in the game -- but when it became apparent that they weren't getting to Elway, there was no fallback position, no "specials" or "exotics" or blitzes that the Broncos hadn't seen on film, no creative ways of bringing pressure. No boldness, no sense of urgency -- geez, we've got to do something, anything, to rattle the QB. Rarely would they bring a fifth rusher, and when they did, the Broncos adjusted and picked him up as well.

Was this a lack of courage by defensive coordinator Rich Brooks , or just a reliance on a standard defense that had held up during the season? The Falcons are not a blitzing team. During the year their DBs and linebackers (not linebackers who drop into a down position for the rush, like Chad Brown or Bryce Paup, but stand-up 'backers) recorded only seven sacks, third lowest in the NFL behind Chicago and Jacksonville, both anemic pass-rush teams. But when the game is slipping away and your zone is springing holes and your tackling is miserable, as the Falcons' was, good grief, do something, do anything. This is the Super Bowl, fellas, the big one.

There's another reason why the Falcons should have put Elway to the test. He was coming off a very shaky performance against the Jets. He hadn't looked good in three of his final five games coming in. I got hold of Bubby Brister during the week and asked him what was wrong with the QB.

"You mean against the Jets?" he said.

"Well, yeah."

"The wind," he said.

"Testaverde handled it OK."

Brister paused for a moment. "He didn't have his base under him," he said. "His leg's been acting up, or his pulled hamstring, or something. He just wasn't throwing right."

"Is it the kind of thing that can heal in two weeks?" I asked him.

"Fingers crossed," he said.

So you bring the rushers and see what's what. Instead the Falcons sat back and handed him an MVP day. Which doesn't mean that Elway doesn't deserve all the credit in the world for running a terrific offensive show, it's just that it might have been interesting to see what would have happened if he'd been forced to do more on the go.

The Broncos, in describing the defense that forced three interceptions and severely limited the Falcons in the red zone, made the double-zone, with the corners playing up and the safeties deep behind them, sound like some kind of master stroke. Sure it can work, especially with some of the variations they gave it, but only with pressure in front of it. The Broncos didn't hold back. On the sack that ended the Falcons' first series when they got in deep, Denver came with cornerback Darien Gordon, who used up the last remaining blocker, followed by linebacker Bill Romanowski, who brought Chandler down. "Venus" was the name the Broncos gave that stunt. They blitzed their linebackers all evening, together and in tandem, at times bringing all three.

Sure, it put pressure on their DBs to hold their coverage, but they figured it was worth the gamble. The Falcons have just as good cover people as Denver does, but they wouldn't take a chance. The double-zone that worked for the Broncos killed Atlanta, especially on the 80-yarder.

That should have been the tipoff that things weren't right in the secondary, particularly in the area patrolled by Pro Bowl free safety Eugene Robinson. In his 11 years with Seattle he was one of the game's finest, and least-known, safetymen, blessed with great ball instincts and coverage ability. At Green Bay in '96 and '97 he achieved elder-statesman status, clever, wise, terrific at keeping things together. The Falcons brought him in, at age 35, to unify their secondary, which he did. His legs weren't what they used to be, but he knew the angles and he didn't miss many tackles.

The Super Bowl should have been the winding down of a great career, then within 24 hours it all fell apart for him. The Saturday night bust on 22nd and Biscayne, the hours in the police station, the sleepless night ...God knows what kind of agony he and his family went through. Lunacy from the go ... what ever made him do it? Maybe I'm too soft, but I can only feel compassion for a man I've respected as an athlete and a person for 14 years.

He took a bad angle on Smith, on that 80-yard run. Worse, he seemed locked to a spot. His legs looked dead. During the game he was missing tackles. His worst play came in the fourth quarter, on a little circle route to Davis that turned into a 39-yarder when Robinson, off-balance, grasped air.

The play set up the TD that made the score 31-13, but the game was over long before that. Elway saw to that. So did the only team on the field that played with any sense of urgency.

Got a question or comment for Dr. Z? Click here.

 
Related information
Stories
Peter King's Monday Morning QB: Post-Super Bowl XXXIII
From SI: The Magnificent 7
Dr. Z's Mailbag
Multimedia
Click here for the latest audio and video
Search our site Watch CNN/SI 24 hours a day

Sports Illustrated and CNN have combined to form a 24 hour sports news and information channel. To receive CNN/SI at your home call 1-888-53-CNNSI.


To the top

Copyright © 1999 CNN/SI. A Time Warner Company.
All Rights Reserved.

Terms under which this service is provided to you.
Read our privacy guidelines.